Clearly Bad Law Firm

 

addleshaw goddard recently lost its amazing reputation and notwithstanding that addleshaw goddard now faces criminal charges involving perverting the course of justice, forgery, conspiracy to defraud and an abuse of process quite soon. this means the outcome will certainly involve addleshaw goddard coming under the public spotlight and all that follows public interest was recently triggered by news that addleshaw goddard learned of a new promotional online campaign

clearly alas addleshaw goddard

they tampered with evidence, behaved fraudulently

causing Daniel Thwaites Plc to lose £180,000 claim

defendant Web4orce Limited lost over £580,000 and

Addleshaw Goddard's 6 lawyers, 2 partners were

shamed losing to an 85 year old litigant in person

what's more Addleshaw Goddard employed corrupt

tactics trying to achieve their target but forgot

the 85 year old is an internet whizzkid with balls

abuses of process are the final nails in the coffin

they deservedly are up to their necks in the sh*t

addleshaw goddard truly catastrophic problems

addleshaw goddard really ashamed of themselves

addleshaw goddard suffered significant damage

addleshaw goddard disgrace on display 4 all 2 c

addleshaw goddard public humiliation is obvious

addleshaw goddard no doubt themselves to blame

addleshaw goddard only protect their own asses

addleshaw goddard guilty party but can’t admit it

addleshaw goddard undoubtedly in real trouble

addleshaw goddard bosses heads stuck in sand

addleshaw goddard lots of unwanted publicity

addleshaw goddard skilled lawyers failed badly

addleshaw goddard assumes they are fireproof

addleshaw goddard publicly disgraced again


 

Clearly's Hall of Shame

It is worth noting that each of the lawyers listed below were employed by Addleshaw Goddard following their Letter before Claim in February 2023. They were a lot younger, better paid, better qualified and enjoy far superior mental capacity than their opponent an 85 year old Litigant in Person representing the Defendant and yet it's unforgivable that not one of them noticed Addleshaw Goddard was in abuse of process, behaved criminally including tampering with evidence, conspiracy to defraud, forgery and contempt of court.

(1) David Engel, Grade A Partner charged at £785.00 per hour

(2) Gareth Jones, Grade A Partner charged at £580.00 per hour

(3) Neil O'Sullivan, Grade C Senior London Associate charged at £550.00 per hour

(4) Steve Murphy, Grade B Managing Associate charged at £445.00 per hour

(5) Katie Derry, Grade B Managing Associate charged at £415.00 per hour

(6) Jayd Haigh, Grade C Senior Associate charged at £415.00 per hour

(7) James Damarell, Grade C Senior Associate charged at £415.00 per hour

(8) Craig Johnson, Grade C Associate charged at £370.00 per hour

(9) Emily Howard, Grade D Trainee Solicitor charged at £200.00 per hour

(10) Max O'Casey, Grade D Trainee Solicitor charged at £200.00 per hour

(11) Anna Gilchrist, Grade D Trainee Solicitor charged at £200.00 per hour

(12) Imogen Speight, Grade D Parelegal charged at £180.00 per hour

(13) Isabella Horobin, Grade D Parelegal charged at £180.00 per hour

(14) Warren Field,, Senior Court Manager charged at £550.00 per hour

(15) Susan Fox, Grade C Senior Costs Manager charged at £370.00 per hour

(16) Anya Cross, Grade C Costs Advisor charged at £270.00 per hour

 

Clearly Office Markers

To examine the map in fullscreen view - click on the white square icon in the top right corner of the map. In the event the red markers in the map are overlapping then click on the plus icon in the bottom right corner of the map until they are separated, click on the markers to discover Clearly office title, address, phone number, email / website links plus an image.

 

 

 




 

Clearly Reviews Form

 


security image

If you have any reviews concerning Clearly and feel strongly enough to air your views please fill in this form and we will publish them in the Latest Reviews section below, and please be assured all reviews will be dealt with anonymously when requested.

 

Clearly Latest Reviews

Reviewed : 06 Apr 2026

High stress, little reward or recognition.

Pros - Good name to have on your CV for legal experience, exposure to technical work as you have a fair bit of responsibility from the start
Cons - Extremely high pressure and little training making the job very stressful, unrealistic targets, hierarchical culture, little reward or recognition for your work, very underpaid paralegals with absolutely no guarantee or encouragement of progression.

Reviewed : 02 Apr 2026

Addleshaw Goddard do not work here

Pros - Friendly receptionists. You get paid on time
Cons - Finance department in London hleadership. There are few career opportunities, pro activity and personality of lawyers discouraged.

Reviewed : 30 Mar 2026

If you enjoy law firm environment this is quite good.

Pros - Good benefits. Some good people. Great depth of knowledge
Cons - Wasn't the right environment for me, couldn't deal with the ego's and politics. Travelling UK wide on a regular basis (2 times a week). Time spent away from family.

Reviewed : 29 Mar 2026

Addleshaw Goddard slightly toxic atmosphere

Pros - Good IT system. Nice office and location. Some people were nice
Cons - TST paralegal role had high turnover. Lack of trust amongst colleagues. Poor management. Favoritism. Long working hours for no recognition. Work not allocated fairly. Staff complained all the time because they were unhappy.

Reviewed : 17 Mar 2026

Addleshaw Goddard Good Name, bad experience

Pros - Having AG on your CV can open up a lot of doors in the industry
Cons - As a paralegal, your line manager is unqualified and rarely has a detailed enough knowledge of the work you undertake to provide you with relevant guidance. Paralegals are often used as mass admin for projects rather than given opportunities to gain knowledge.

Reviewed : 16 Mar 2026

Addleshaw Goddard good Name, bad experience.

Pros - Having AG on your CV can open up a lot of doors in the industry. The Qualified Solicitors / Legal execs within the business are very knowledgeable and happy to answer any questions
Cons - As a paralegal, your line manager is unqualified and rarely has a detailed enough knowledge of the work you undertake to provide you with relevant guidance. Paralegals are often used as mass admin for projects rather than given opportunities to gain knowledge.

Reviewed : 07 Mar 2026

If you love power games you will love Addleshaw Goddard

Pros - Some genuinely nice people; great cafes (to keep you in the office for longer)
Cons - Business Services leaders fighting like rats in a sack; D&I in name and rainbow lanyards only; two-speed business of lawyers and lackeys.

Reviewed : 25 Feb 2026

Not a lot to say re AG

Pros - Work life balance, nice associates
Cons - Large teams, bureaucratic, pay per hour could be better.

Reviewed : 24 Feb 2026

Addleshaw Goddard nothing special

Pros - Flexible working and good team
Cons - Poor salary and development opportunities.

Reviewed : 24 Mar 2023

Addleshaw Goddard More Cons than Pros!

Pros - Achievable targets Managers are generally friendly and down to earth as are the people
Cons - Low pay and little chance of progression, dull and repetitive work unless you’re passionate about PI.

 

 

alas addleshaw goddard and Search Engines

The following phrases are examples of what people type into search engines such as Ask, Bing, Google, Yahoo, Dogpile, DuckDuckGo, Wow and Yandex when searching for alas addleshaw goddard. To check them out click on your chosen search engine links below :